On the recordApril 20, 2007
I think that this amendment gets to what the consequences of this underlying bill are. Now, we have heard some contradictory information from the proponents of this bill. Some say it doesn't mean anything. Some say it is very important and that the consequences are remarkable. I would suggest that, frankly, we don't know what mandating to companies and to publicly traded companies in this Nation, what this bill will do. I don't think that we, as Congress, know. I think the consequences may be remarkable and significant. I do know that it would be helpful and appropriate for all of us to have that information, to have the information about what the unintended consequences of this might be. So this amendment is an amendment to address that. It would ensure that this legislation will not compromise fair competition and a level playing field for publicly traded companies. The amendment would require the SEC, the Securities and Exchange Commission, to conduct a study to determine whether a separate nonbinding vote, what the bill mandates, whether or not that would hinder a publicly traded company's ability to compete for the best available candidates for its officers and directors.
Source
govinfo.gov




