In allocating 2 hours for debate on a resolution authorizing an inquiry of impeachment, the Congress is adhering to precedent, the precedents established by the House of Representatives when it was under Democratic control. It is in fact doubling the amount of time that was spent in debate on the identical resolution in February, 1974. Likewise, the wording of the resolution adheres directly to precedent. The minority argues today that an impeachment inquiry should be narrowly limited to the evidence we already know, but on February 6, 1974, when the Democrats were in the majority, Committee on the Judiciary Chairman Rodino stated: 'To be locked into . . . a date (for completion of the inquiry) would be totally irresponsible and unwise.' The inquiry, he said, must be 'thorough, so that we can make a fair and responsible judgment.' The resolution does, as it must, follow precedent. We, in undertaking this solemn constitutional duty, must follow precedent. A vote for the resolution is a vote for a fair, full, and complete inquiry today, just as in 1974.
TJ Cox: “In allocating 2 hours for debate on a resolution authorizing an inquiry of impeachment, the Congress is adhering to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the resolution authorizing an inquiry of impeachment and its adherence to precedent.
Share
More from TJ Cox
I thank the chairman once again. Mr. Chairman, an amendment to strike the funding in the bill for KEDO was made in order. My amendment was prompted by reports that North Korea has in fact developed nuclear weapons, that it has thus far…
I rise to seek clarification concerning one provision of the bill. Section 6(c) is entitled ``Opposition to Multilateralization of ABM Treaty.'' It states the sense of the Congress that no agreement demarcating the boundary between theater…
I rise simply to defend the late William French Smith, who cannot be here to defend himself. When the Attorney General of the United States determined that it was not appropriate to institute on behalf of the Congress of the United States…
We cannot afford a death spiral of disinvestment and declining service for the transit system that gets our federal workforce to work each day.





