I thank the chairman once again. Mr. Chairman, an amendment to strike the funding in the bill for KEDO was made in order. My amendment was prompted by reports that North Korea has in fact developed nuclear weapons, that it has thus far failed to permit third-party inspections of its nuclear facilities adequate to account for its stocks of highly enriched weapons-grade plutonium and that KEDO has sought to borrow funds in excess of its direct international funding. Since the committee's inclusion of KEDO funding is premised on the administration's representations about these very matters, I once again inquire, will the chairman be willing to revisit the provision of this bill at a future date if the reports to which I have referred prove to be true?
TJ Cox: “I thank the chairman once again. Mr. Chairman, an amendment to strike the funding in the bill for KEDO was made in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment regarding funding for KEDO in light of North Korea's nuclear developments.
Share
More from TJ Cox
The gentlewoman is correct. It is my clear understanding that Congress did not, in adopting the Reform Act, intend to alter standards of liability under the Exchange Act.
Mr. Chairman, everything that was just said makes a great deal of sense provided that we stipulate that the Federal Government is the low-cost provider, that the most efficient way to get the most roads, the most bridges, and the most…
I am here, today, to urge the subcommittee to include sufficient funding to maintain and upgrade California's water storage and conveyance systems.
I wonder if I might inquire whether it is the chairman's further understanding that KEDO is assuming substantial debts with some estimates that these debts total over $40 million?





