I rise simply to defend the late William French Smith, who cannot be here to defend himself. When the Attorney General of the United States determined that it was not appropriate to institute on behalf of the Congress of the United States enforcement proceedings for a congressional subpoena, he was doing something very different than what we are talking about here tonight. What we have before us is a subpoena that has been authorized by the United States District Court. No such authorization was given in the case of the Gorsuch subpoena. That was a subpoena issued by Congress without any court involvement.
TJ Cox: “I rise simply to defend the late William French Smith, who cannot be here to defend himself. When the Attorney General…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending the late William French Smith regarding congressional subpoenas.
Share
More from TJ Cox
Does the gentleman from Massachusetts think that Article V of the Constitution distrusts democracy? Does the gentleman think when three-quarters of the State legislatures have to approve what we are doing here today by a bare majority…
I rise to seek clarification concerning one provision of the bill. Section 6(c) is entitled ``Opposition to Multilateralization of ABM Treaty.'' It states the sense of the Congress that no agreement demarcating the boundary between theater…
That interpretation is the correct interpretation. As the gentleman knows, that section of this resolution, section 7, is taken essentially verbatim from the rules of the House concerning the procedures for the Permanent Select Committee…
I wonder if I might inquire whether it is the chairman's further understanding that KEDO is assuming substantial debts with some estimates that these debts total over $40 million?





