You assessed these at the very top of the market and haven't reassessed them since.

the rule as it is currently written is a bunch of gobbledygook.

Are we watching an effort to expel the public from the public's lands?

That ought to be a screaming warning that you were charging well above market rates.

That is gobbledygook. What specific actions have you taken?

What specifically have you done to redress these grievances? So far I have heard absolutely nothing.

When ecological trumps the social and those economic values, you have gone beyond the mandates that Congress set for them.

It seems to me that we are slowly inching back toward those bad old days that the Magna Carta redressed.

I agree that as Americans we must manage our native species so they thrive for future generations; however, I do not believe that managing America's natural resources and promoting America's continued economic prosperity are mutually…

When a judge uses words like 'arbitrary and capricious,' accuses the national Fish and Wildlife Service scientists of lying for political goals, we take that very, very seriously.

I'm convinced, that instead of spending another half trillion dollars of taxpayer money on a questionable stimulus plan, Congress needs to help private industry create more jobs by reducing the burden of over-regulation.

If this action by the Fish and Wildlife Service continues, we will not have the water to grow.