Would you say that the greatest single threat in extreme weather, either hot or cold, is a lack of electricity?

I think we also learned that depending upon law enforcement alone is not sufficient.

That seems to be a bit of a double standard.

Why would responsible officials take this step? Because they want to protect the sanctity of every vote by guarding against voter fraud.

These provisions are not just anti-democratic. They are patently, patently unconstitutional.

Every citizen who wants to vote and is qualified to vote should vote without any fear of intimidation or discrimination.

to me there are provisions in here that are anti-democratic, taking away the right of voters to make their own decisions

Overall, it federalizes and micromanages the election process and imposes unnecessary, unwise, and, in some cases, unconstitutional mandates on the states.

H.R. 1 is also a 'For the Violent Criminals Act.'

H.R. 1 overrides those votes and their communities.

H.R. 1 forces taxpayers to expand the dark web of anonymous donors.

But if you are earnestly for the people, if you want everyday citizens to have the power that only comes through their ability to hold elected officials accountable at the ballot box, you send this bill back to the drafting table.