Political Quotes

Norman Mineta: many of my colleagues have raised two questions about today's legislation. First, will the District pay the money back…

On the recordJuly 31, 1995
many of my colleagues have raised two questions about today's legislation. First, will the District pay the money back and second, will we be here a few years from now facing a similar situation? I want to assure the Members that this bill was crafted specifically to address these two concerns. That's why it contains numerous accountability provisions to ensure that the District will not only promptly repay, in full, its local share, but also will dedicate stable, reliable funding for the future transportation program. Unlike previous, broad-based waivers, such as the one offered to all States in 1991, this bill requires the District to repay in cash, beginning next year. The bill also requires the District to establish a dedicated highway account, funded by motor fuel taxes and vehicles fees, to ensure that funds are available for the cash loan repayment and for future local shares. No longer will the District to able to rely solely on general obligation bonds to fund its local share. In addition, the District's new financial control board has assured the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure that the Board will closely monitor District compliance with the terms of today's bill. In closing, let me just remind my colleagues why we have Federal involvement in highway construction. Local road conditions have regional and national effects.…
Said by
Norman Mineta
California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing accountability provisions in legislation regarding the District's transportation funding.

Share

More from Norman Mineta

Mar 2, 1995

Everyone who has spoken against the Mineta-Davis amendment voted no on Goss. On the other hand, 210 Members voted aye. Those 210 Members I assume, if they are consistent in their politics, will vote aye tomorrow. Now, how can Members on…

govinfo.gov
Feb 1, 1995

In general the bill before us is an attempt to limit the intrusiveness of the Federal Government into the business of State and local governments and private businesses. Many of us disagree with how the bill goes about meeting those…

govinfo.gov
Jan 4, 1995

the new majority in the House of Representatives have put forward a number of suggestions for reform here in the Congress. Some of these proposals have merit, some do not. But I believe that one of the most damaging, and fiscally…

govinfo.gov
May 12, 1994

I rise today in support of the conference report on S. 2000, the Head Start Act amendments. Specifically, I would like to comment on the necessity of mandatory funding for Head Start and the inclusion of multilingual programs reflective of…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation