Political Quotes

Norman Mineta: In general the bill before us is an attempt to limit the intrusiveness of the Federal Government into the business of…

On the recordFebruary 1, 1995
In general the bill before us is an attempt to limit the intrusiveness of the Federal Government into the business of State and local governments and private businesses. Many of us disagree with how the bill goes about meeting those objectives, but we do not disagree with the objectives themselves. In the area of transportation, economic regulation in particular, I have been among the most consistent advocates of the economic deregulation of transportation. The gentleman from Pennsylvania is very familiar with my efforts as a deregulator, because he has been an important part of those efforts, and so have many Members on his side of the aisle. In the past 15 years, we have largely deregulated the airlines, pipelines, trucking, and railroads. We have dramatically reduced the intrusiveness of government into the marketplace. And in every instance we have concluded that what we wanted to achieve was deregulation, not a substitute of State regulation for Federal regulation. Deregulation means get government out of the issue.
Said by
Norman Mineta
California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a bill aimed at limiting federal government intrusiveness in state and local affairs.

Share

More from Norman Mineta

May 10, 1994

As the gentleman will recall, the introduced bill by request only had the Economic Development Administration, but historically the Committee on Public Works and Transportation in dealing with the Economic Development Act always has with…

govinfo.gov
May 12, 1994

I rise today in support of the conference report on S. 2000, the Head Start Act amendments. Specifically, I would like to comment on the necessity of mandatory funding for Head Start and the inclusion of multilingual programs reflective of…

govinfo.gov
Jan 20, 1995

I rise in strong support of Mr. Towns' amendment. I believe that this amendment addresses a glaring flaw in H.R. 5 as it is now written. The flaw is that the bill, without the Towns amendment, could deprive our constituents of the…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

Reclaiming my time, I reiterate again that this is the same as the Goss amendment. In that regard, there is no change. So, Mr. Chairman, I feel this is a fair and equitable amendment. It does not gut the bill. Just as there were 210 who…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation