As the gentleman will recall, the introduced bill by request only had the Economic Development Administration, but historically the Committee on Public Works and Transportation in dealing with the Economic Development Act always has with it the Appalachian Regional Commission, so to the extent we added ARC to the introduced bill, or to our bill, we had to get a technical waiver, the gentleman is absolutely correct on that. Mr. Speaker, we did have a cost estimate as to title I and title II portion of the bill. The Committee on Public Works and Transportation really never asked for a general waiver nor is there a violation of the Budget Act in this provision or in the introduced bill or in the substitute that we have under consideration here. Mr. Speaker, I just wanted to explain our committee's position on the relevant points that the gentleman brought up, and I hope the gentleman will accept the explanation for that.
Norman Mineta: “As the gentleman will recall, the introduced bill by request only had the Economic Development Administration, but…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Economic Development Administration and related legislative waivers.
Share
More from Norman Mineta
the Mineta-Davis amendment is the bipartisan alternative to the Goss amendment which we considered and nearly approved last night. When the Goss amendment was defeated by one vote, many members approached me--very concerned that a…
Everyone is familiar with our recent legacy of natural disasters. Hugo, Andrew, Iniki, Loma Prieta, Northridge. The names alone are sufficient to conjure images of death and destruction. But experts tell us that these are but a prelude to…
I rise in support of the Borski amendment. This amendment assures that we do not cripple our future efforts at protecting the basic rights of our constituents. As we learned so dramatically in Milwaukee, when over 100 individuals died…
Reclaiming my time, I reiterate again that this is the same as the Goss amendment. In that regard, there is no change. So, Mr. Chairman, I feel this is a fair and equitable amendment. It does not gut the bill. Just as there were 210 who…





