the new majority in the House of Representatives have put forward a number of suggestions for reform here in the Congress. Some of these proposals have merit, some do not. But I believe that one of the most damaging, and fiscally questionable, is the proposal to eliminate Legislative Service Organizations here in the House. Some Members on the other side of the aisle have suggested that elimination of LSO's will save money. Nothing could be further from the truth. LSO's have given Members of this body, both Republicans and Democrats, the ability to combine their resources to more efficiently pursue policies they would have pursued anyway. Eliminating LSO's will not mean that Members of these caucuses will stop working on these issues. Far from it. As an associate member of both the Congressional Black and Hispanic Caucuses, I can assure my colleagues that the work of these caucuses will not stop. As chairman of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, which had hoped to organize as an LSO and will now be prevented from doing so, I can assure my colleagues that our work will continue as well. If that work requires that each caucus member duplicate within his or her individual office the work that could be done more efficiently and at a lower cost by one person working for an LSO, then so be it. The moral imperative that each of us feels to ensure that all Americans are represented in this House will not be changed.
Norman Mineta: “the new majority in the House of Representatives have put forward a number of suggestions for reform here in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the proposal to eliminate Legislative Service Organizations in the House of Representatives.
Share
More from Norman Mineta
Many Members on the other side have to talk in other contexts about how we should always fully consider the cost versus the benefits before we proceed. But in this bill they would require an analysis of everything except the benefits. Now…
Everyone who has spoken against the Mineta-Davis amendment voted no on Goss. On the other hand, 210 Members voted aye. Those 210 Members I assume, if they are consistent in their politics, will vote aye tomorrow. Now, how can Members on…
I rise today in strong opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. Chairman, passage of this amendment would prove to be harmful to our economy and our international relationships. Under the current United…
Everyone is familiar with our recent legacy of natural disasters. Hugo, Andrew, Iniki, Loma Prieta, Northridge. The names alone are sufficient to conjure images of death and destruction. But experts tell us that these are but a prelude to…





