I rise today in strong opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. Chairman, passage of this amendment would prove to be harmful to our economy and our international relationships. Under the current United States-Japan and United States-Euratom agreements, our trade of nuclear materials and technologies with Japan and Europe has flourished. These relationships have resulted in thousands of U.S. jobs and billions of dollars in U.S. exports. The effect of this amendment will be to harm the United States relationship with Japan and Europe, and to hurt United States business. I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Norman Mineta: “I rise today in strong opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. Chairman, passage of…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to trade agreements during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from Norman Mineta
In my opinion, if my friend would further yield, it seems to me that again in those instances, the gentleman used the example of CALPERS as a number of us did, it seems to me that whether they are sophisticated individuals who are…
It is the same as the Goss amendment. In this instance, it just changes it from 30 percent to 20 percent, and the Goss amendment had 210 votes.
Under the example the gentleman gives, it seems to me that the SEC would still be able to bring an action against the individual, or there are State regulations or there is common law fraud that would still subject the maker of those kinds…
I just would like to make a short comment that I oppose this amendment. This is just another waiver of standards, another rollback of existing requirements, and it is specifically for Anchorage, AK. If this amendment is adopted, the law…





