I rise today in strong opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. Chairman, passage of this amendment would prove to be harmful to our economy and our international relationships. Under the current United States-Japan and United States-Euratom agreements, our trade of nuclear materials and technologies with Japan and Europe has flourished. These relationships have resulted in thousands of U.S. jobs and billions of dollars in U.S. exports. The effect of this amendment will be to harm the United States relationship with Japan and Europe, and to hurt United States business. I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Norman Mineta: “I rise today in strong opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. Chairman, passage of…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to trade agreements during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from Norman Mineta
it is supported by the American Business Conference, the American Electronics Association, the Association of Publicly Traded Companies, the Business Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Venture Capital…
It is the same as the Goss amendment. In this instance, it just changes it from 30 percent to 20 percent, and the Goss amendment had 210 votes.
Mr. Chairman, today's young people think I am making a joke when I tell them about a river catching fire. That actually happened to the Cuyahoga in Ohio, it was so polluted with industrial wastes and inflammable solvents. In Oregon 3…
the idea of waiving secondary treatment standards sounds alarms because the successes of the Clean Water Act over the past 23 years are attributable in large part to the act's requirements for a baseline level of treatment--secondary…





