In my opinion, if my friend would further yield, it seems to me that again in those instances, the gentleman used the example of CALPERS as a number of us did, it seems to me that whether they are sophisticated individuals who are investors, or the grandmother who wants to buy stock for grandchildren, that they would still be subject to the provisions of this bill and that they are going to be subject to suit. On the other hand, let me also mention where the gentleman said the SEC is drawing rules on this right now, as I understand it they are just looking at the issue. They have done nothing to get into rulemaking or even holding a hearing on this issue.
Norman Mineta: “In my opinion, if my friend would further yield, it seems to me that again in those instances, the gentleman used the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on investors and the SEC's rulemaking process.
Share
More from Norman Mineta
What traditionally has been a quantitative funding issue for our nation's infrastructure has now become a qualitative policy issue. In other words, fighting the perennial battle of getting more money from traditional sources won't suffice…
Reclaiming my time, I reiterate again that this is the same as the Goss amendment. In that regard, there is no change. So, Mr. Chairman, I feel this is a fair and equitable amendment. It does not gut the bill. Just as there were 210 who…
I just would like to make a short comment that I oppose this amendment. This is just another waiver of standards, another rollback of existing requirements, and it is specifically for Anchorage, AK. If this amendment is adopted, the law…
My objection is this: that last year we worked to grant the city of San Diego the opportunity to apply under previously expired provisions to apply for a waiver. I thought we did that in good faith, with the city of San Diego also agreeing…





