under the example the gentleman gives, it seems to me that the SEC would still be able to bring an action against the individual, or there are State regulations or there is common law fraud that would still subject the maker of those kinds of statements to action.
Norman Mineta: “under the example the gentleman gives, it seems to me that the SEC would still be able to bring an action against the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the regulatory powers of the SEC in relation to individual actions.
Share
More from Norman Mineta
Many Members on the other side have to talk in other contexts about how we should always fully consider the cost versus the benefits before we proceed. But in this bill they would require an analysis of everything except the benefits. Now…
this amendment would make this bill's provisions on risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis consistent with those in H.R. 1022, the Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Act of 1995 already passed by the House earlier this year. This bill…
the Special Olympics is a program which gives handicapped children and adults the opportunity to compete in sporting events and thereby enhance their self-esteem and self-image. The Torch Relay Run through the Capitol Grounds is an annual…
What traditionally has been a quantitative funding issue for our nation's infrastructure has now become a qualitative policy issue. In other words, fighting the perennial battle of getting more money from traditional sources won't suffice…





