EPA's interpretation of the governing Clean Air Act provisions is 'unambiguously correct.'
I would respectfully submit that if they are losing their jobs, it is not because of regulation.
There is no way to govern responsibly if you refuse to accept the findings of the National Academy of Sciences.
This willful blindness may enrich oil companies and other big polluters, but it is reckless, and it is dangerous.
The question we should be asking is not what we can do to stop reasonable regulation but how we can help the families wh...
At the hearing last week, we heard dire predictions about the effect of regulating carbon pollution under the Clean Air ...
For the past 18 months, we have heard repeated claims that EPA's actions on greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act wer...
That is because the Tailoring Rule ensures that only the largest sources of greenhouse gases are currently subject to pe...
If we are going to do big things, it has to be done on a bipartisan basis.
I was the only member of the committee back in the 1980s that voted against the re-regulation of cable.
Digital technology and broadband Internet access are dramatically altering how video content is produced, delivered and ...