Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 8, 2010
The House passed the food safety bill a year ago July. Not this July, but the July in 2009. And we waited for the Senate to act, and they recently acted by 73-25 in favor of the legislation. When we had it before us it was 283 supporters. Now, the Senate made some changes in the bill. But all advocacy groups, all the public interest groups, have told us that FDA needs this legislation to be able to protect the American people from unsafe food, whether it's domestic or foreign imported foods. This legislation gives them important tools. They have clear authority to issue and require manufacturers to meet strong, enforceable standards to ensure the safety of various types of foods. This bill does not create unnecessary burdens for farmers and small businesses. It would allow FDA to exercise their new authorities and require manufacturers to implement actions like preventive systems to stop outbreaks before they occur. I would have preferred the House bill rather than the amendment in the Senate bill. But sometimes you have to accept a change that you may not favor at first blush. But to have us defeat this bill and have the American people go without the tools in FDA's hands to stop unsafe foods would be irresponsible. I urge support for the legislation.
Said by
Henry Waxman
Democratic · California
Source
govinfo.gov
Dec 8, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker is discussing the importance of the food safety bill and urging support for it.

Share

More from Henry Waxman

Mar 11, 2019

the Federal Government would maintain its commitment to sharing the costs of providing basic healthcare and long-term coverage to vulnerable Americans.

congress.gov
Dec 2, 2014

Families all across the country expect the safety devices in their vehicles to work.

congress.gov
Apr 10, 2018

A vision without funding is a hallucination.

congress.gov
Nov 19, 2014

So what we are seeing is something that sounds good from a party that has no credibility to say that they are for more science information. What they would do is limit what EPA would be able to use to determine, based on the science, what…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation