If the gentleman from Texas will yield, let me say this: I want to stop just short of suggesting that perhaps scare tactics have been used in this debate. Local officials need help we all admit from the Federal Government in fighting local crime problems, and the burden in hand is, of course, the funding under last year's crimes bill. All we are saying is we think we can take a better approach and actually maximize discretion and decisionmaking in our bill. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Frank Riggs: “If the gentleman from Texas will yield, let me say this: I want to stop just short of suggesting that perhaps scare…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for federal support in local crime issues during a debate.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
So the amendment in its current form is intended to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to prevent the City and County of San Francisco government... from being able to use Federal taxpayer funding... to require that private…
That mandate is embedded in current law, and what we are trying to do now by proposing reforms to the Federal Bilingual and Immigration Education Acts is to give local school districts more say, more flexibility, more discretion, more…
I just want to point out how absurd the arguments are in opposition to this, because the District of Columbia is already relying extensively on private schools. This is the Washington Post, April 28, and I quote, ``The District of…
Our concern is that we do not want Federal law to necessarily override State law with respect to the day-to-day administration of bilingual education programs. I think the gentleman from California (Mr. Martinez) would acknowledge that…





