I am very comfortable with language that would say that a court order, Federal court order would take precedence over State and local law with respect to bilingual education or State local policy. But, Mr. Chairman, I cannot support an amendment that appears to be intended to create an escape hatch, an 'out clause' for local school districts in California that do not want to comply with a voter-approved ballot initiative that passed by a margin of 61 to 39 percent.
Frank Riggs: “I am very comfortable with language that would say that a court order, Federal court order would take precedence over…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed amendment on bilingual education and local compliance with a ballot initiative.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
yes, and my opinion is that that local school district should have to go to court to adjudicate an unclear or conflicting provision between Federal and State law. And then if a Federal court order results, then obviously that local school…
Mr. Chairman, I just again want to, for the benefit of all my colleagues, put matters in perspective in terms of what is taking place in the University of California system. The latest systemwide data released by the University of…
the headline says ``The Salvation Army has decided to end its contracts with San Francisco and shrink programs serving the homeless, drug addicts and the elderly because of a dispute over the city's domestic partners law. Some, if not…
I again rise to thank the majority leader for his outstanding efforts on behalf of the District of Columbia children and families. Mr. Chairman, I simply want to make sure that Members understand what we are talking about here. The Armey…





