I am very astounded to hear the gentleman say that our proposed reforms constitute a one-size-fits-all mandate imposed on State and local education agencies. My question to the gentleman... is does he realize that under current Federal law, 75 percent of all Federal taxpayer funding for bilingual education instruction must go for native language instruction and does not that constitute a one-size-fits-all mandate with respect to 75 percent of the funding?
Frank Riggs: “I am very astounded to hear the gentleman say that our proposed reforms constitute a one-size-fits-all mandate imposed…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about federal mandates in bilingual education funding.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
That mandate is embedded in current law, and what we are trying to do now by proposing reforms to the Federal Bilingual and Immigration Education Acts is to give local school districts more say, more flexibility, more discretion, more…
Our concern is that we do not want Federal law to necessarily override State law with respect to the day-to-day administration of bilingual education programs. I think the gentleman from California (Mr. Martinez) would acknowledge that…
Now, what did the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decide in the Hopwood case? Hopwood v. The University of Texas, I quote: ``The 5th circuit ruled that diversity does not justify preferential admissions based on race.''
I am very comfortable with language that would say that a court order, Federal court order would take precedence over State and local law with respect to bilingual education or State local policy. But, Mr. Chairman, I cannot support an…





