Our concern is that we do not want Federal law to necessarily override State law with respect to the day-to-day administration of bilingual education programs. I think the gentleman from California (Mr. Martinez) would acknowledge that bilingual education is first and foremost a responsibility of State and local government, and that is the concern that we have on this side. I am very open to the suggestion that we make sure that a Federal court order would have the highest priority and would override State and local law.
Frank Riggs: “Our concern is that we do not want Federal law to necessarily override State law with respect to the day-to-day…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about federal versus state authority in bilingual education during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
I am very astounded to hear the gentleman say that our proposed reforms constitute a one-size-fits-all mandate imposed on State and local education agencies. My question to the gentleman... is does he realize that under current Federal…
I wish I would have heard a better response to his concerns from the delegate for the District of Columbia than to simply say, try parental choice in the City of Alexandria public schools. It so happens that the City of Alexandria…
Now, what did the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decide in the Hopwood case? Hopwood v. The University of Texas, I quote: ``The 5th circuit ruled that diversity does not justify preferential admissions based on race.''
I do not see how we can support a policy that... facilitates, furthers illegal drug use and actually... puts us as lawmakers... in the position of... engaging in enabling behavior. And, furthermore, it sends the worst possible message that…





