I am happy to clarify the intent behind section 10306 in the bill. Let me say that it is not our intent to create a disparity in funding or eligibility as to Federal categorical education funds, Federal taxpayer aid for public education between traditional public schools and charter schools within a local education agency. Furthermore, it is not our intent to create a new formula-driven funding stream or program to charter schools, other than what they are currently eligible to receive under title I, part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and I hope this addresses the gentleman's concerns.
Frank Riggs: “I am happy to clarify the intent behind section 10306 in the bill. Let me say that it is not our intent to create a…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying the intent of section 10306 regarding funding for charter schools during a House debate.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
I believe affirmative action is outdated. Affirmative action, contrary to what several speakers have suggested, is no longer a black and white issue, certainly not in California, the largest, most diverse State in our Union. Because the…
Now that we have struck that note of bipartisan cooperation and agreement, I just want to interject for the Record, and here I think is the clear, and I believe collegial difference between the Democratic Members of the House of…
the headline says ``The Salvation Army has decided to end its contracts with San Francisco and shrink programs serving the homeless, drug addicts and the elderly because of a dispute over the city's domestic partners law. Some, if not…
I am particularly pleased in the waning days of this Congress, the 105th Congress, in our country's history, we are going to be able to go to conference with the Senate on hopefully a comprehensive approach to combating juvenile crime. As…





