This seems like a front company for a process to avoid public scrutiny.

we need new Federal assistance tools to help local agencies better manage and develop new water supplies critical to a more drought resilient economy.

Sites Reservoir, for example, is foundational to the long-term economic health of our region and the state.

What he underlines is that the prospective Federal agencies' role in the refusal to declare an end to the drought means a loss of control, power, authority, value, or relevance.

The Sites Project represents the kind of new, smart storage that our state needs.

Yes. Bipartisan support to do it----

EPA and Army Corps of Engineers continue to rely upon EPA's interpretation of the Clean Water Act, imposing these regulations that stray far from the Congressional intent.

Some of my constituents are continuous cropping on these lands, otherwise you lose your ability to have that exemption.

I had asked for a report a couple months ago from that. So would you please see to it that I can get that report so that I know that our situation there is stable on that?

Nowhere in the law does it specify that, but that is what is being carried out in my district by EPA or your associates.

If you want your outfit to be known as the Entertainment Prevention Agency amongst millions of racers around the country, I would certainly recommend not pursuing that.

Will you direct your Agency to cease regulating activities that the Clean Water Act exempts?