Dana Rohrabacher

people are not courageous enough to control their own borders will soon lose their country.

I predict that there will be a Cuban-American that is President of the United States, but I won't tell you which one.

I think the assimilation process in this country has a way of absorbing you and making you part of this country.

we can be proud that we bring in 1 million people, immigrants, into our country every year, more than every other country of the world combined in terms of legal immigration.

I think that Hungary was totally justified in what it is doing to try to stem the flow.

I believe is going to change the very nature of Europe.

I believe it is our hostility toward Russia that has prevented us from creating a policy that will create a more stable Middle East.

I am personally upset that our administration has sought to find out and try to complain about every little thing they disagree with, with Hungary.

Well, I don't know, is it possible that some of these reports that we are getting--yes, Assad is a murderous dictator, but some of the magnitude of his oppression and his murder of his own people might be exaggerated to achieve certain…

we are making sure that... we have a screening process, and we are bringing people in who then can be enculturated and assimilated into our society.

Had we been working with the Russians all along in good faith, I believe this situation in the Middle East would have been totally different and better, stayed more stable.

Why do we have to go in and make that decision in Syria?

That's right, and our policies are making the instability worse.

When the people, the poor people of the world figure out that they can come here, and once they get here, they are going to be able to get a job, they are going to be able to get government benefits just like everybody else, there will be…

if our European allies are not willing to stem the flow of large numbers of people who are not native to their territory, they will lose their territory.

But let me just ask, then, about, if, indeed, Assad is removed and we get this third alternative, why won't it be just the same as happened with Gaddafi, where the radical Islamists who hate us now see a weaker adversary, and it will come…

I believe that at this particular moment when we are discussing religious freedom in the world that the overriding issue and attention needs to be on the Christians in the Middle East who are literally targeted for genocide.

We can be happy that that part of the human history has been, as Ronald Reagan said, put into the ash heap of history.

It is horrendous that that is going on and yet we still provide weapons to Pakistan.

It is a very difficult line to draw, what you are talking about.

We want to help refugees whose lives are in danger. That is our moral standard.

In terms of trying to deal with the Islamic threat at a time, we realize it is very easy to see our friends in Saudi Arabia have been sponsoring mosques in order to promote radical Islam.

I would hope that we give priority to Christians and other people who have been actually targeted for their faith.

We are in the process of deciding the defense authorization legislation that will determine how much we spend for our security. Yet, this bill, what we are talking about, includes tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, of dollars…

What we have here is crony capitalism.