I am very interested now what our next major step into space as to what we see it as an international goal and not just an American goal.
Dana Rohrabacher
The Public Record
Dana Rohrabacher is a former U.S. Representative for California's 48th congressional district, serving from 1989 to 2019. A member of the Republican Party, he is known for his libertarian views and strong support for the tech industry. During his time in Congress, Rohrabacher was an advocate for various issues, including technology innovation and foreign policy matters, particularly regarding Taiwan and its democratic governance. He often emphasized the importance of individual liberties and limited government intervention.
The American people have every right to be concerned when we are talking about putting more troops into Afghanistan.
I would hope that we are going to be doing things differently to achieve a different outcome.
I think before we commit more troops to that part of the world, we should certainly seek changes in the way those areas are governed.
Obviously, the Constitution has not worked to create a better Afghanistan, because we are talking about sending more troops into Afghanistan.
I believe that the fact that our President wants to seek out and try to see if there are areas we can actually cooperate in--I think that is a good thing.
If who comes to power are these radical Islamic terrorists, then we have failed.
I would hope that, as we get into this battle, that we are not making a mistake that peaceful change is the only way that happens in the world.
Today, radical Islamic terrorism is the number-one threat to the civilized world.
Radical Islamic terrorists...is the number-one threat to the free people of the world.
I am proud that I played a significant part in the destruction of the Bolshevik regime that controlled the Soviet Union up until Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War as it should have been ended, peacefully.
Can any of you tell me why the Russians gave $150 million to the Clinton Foundation when Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State?
Let us not do it in a way that radical Islamic terrorists will take over governments that are flawed.
It is significant that today is the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, a date which reminds us of the dark and bloody Soviet history.
I think that if I was a Russian listening to this, that is what I would come to the conclusion of: Oh, the Americans have this double standard.
But let me just note that after 9/11 I think that we could say that there is no other country in the world that did more to help cooperate and had a major influence on what we did to defeat the Taliban and kick Saddam Hussein out.
Our American way of life and our Judeo- Christian values are under attack as never before. People understand that there is the threat out there, but perhaps the magnitude keeps coming home of how bad and what a great threat it really is…
I will try to bring up something that we have heard, and we need to discuss this as Americans, because it also is about a very major flaw in our system that is apparent, things that have been not right for the last 2 years. In the past 2…
Don't we have broadcasts going into North Korea? Why would the people of North Korea not know that what he is doing to them he was spared and that he lived in a totally different life than what they are expected to live?
Well, we need to be the champion of these oppressed people around the world, especially when it comes to Christians who are oppressed like this because our own national security will be enhanced by that.
So we don't--so one thing that came out of this hearing today is that you're not suggesting that we--this is a potential danger that needs further investigation in terms of the type of radiation that we are exposed to in the health…
You can say that again. Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to be here with Ranking Member Engel and Chairman Royce. I want to congratulate both of them on the great work that they are doing on especially Middle East issues. Over and over…
I would hope that we can come up with some specific ideas how to encourage these private sector companies, which will utilize the information to actually invest in that transition between basic and utilization.
Is there something that we can do to make the applied go from the basic to the applied and incentivize the private sector to invest money in the applied scientific approach to this issue?
the fact that there have been responsible cuts to various programs is something that will actually, I think, make our scientific community more effective rather than less effective.





