The point I am making is the disclosure was on the bottom of the ad, Coalition for our Children's Future. But the board of directors of Coalition for our Children's Future did not know who was funneling the money through them. They also have an executive director that signed basically an oath of secrecy that he would not disclose who was funneling this money in. They also had an executive director that signed blank checks given to this entity that they had signed a nondisclosure agreement with so that they could keep that secret. This third party entity that was using Coalition for our Children's Future could have been a foreign entity, foreign sources, it could have been criminal sources.
Calvin Dooley: “The point I am making is the disclosure was on the bottom of the ad, Coalition for our Children's Future. But the board…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about undisclosed funding sources for the Coalition for our Children's Future.
Share
More from Calvin Dooley
This draft greatly strengthens the EPA's ability to demand more data by allowing EPA the demand further testing for purposes of prioritization.
As the authors of this legislation have clearly stated, the clear intention of the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Shays) and the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Meehan) was not to infringe in any way on the ability of the Christian…
So the answer then is yes, it is a special interest. The gentleman is receiving money, gobs of it, from special interests and he honestly sits here and pretends that does not happen.
The issue is clear, do we believe as a Congress that the voters of the United States have the right to know who is trying to influence the outcome of an election? Unless we close the issue advocacy loophole, we are not giving the voters…





