I would just like to clarify one point in the amendment that is being offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Solomon) where he is saying he is addressing the issue of the unfunded mandate. But what is somewhat ironic and I think somewhat hypocritical is that, where he is contending that this is an unfunded mandate, his amendment is actually putting that money back in the bill. If we really are concerned about that issue, then we should not have the money in that bill at all.
Calvin Dooley: “I would just like to clarify one point in the amendment that is being offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to unfunded mandates during a House debate.
Share
More from Calvin Dooley
I clearly support that right, and the Shays-Meehan legislation is carefully crafted to ensure that voter guides will be able to continue to be published.
Mr. Speaker, this motion is not about condoning any of the human rights abuses or any of the infringements upon personal freedoms in Cuba. Those of us who are advancing this policy and this motion believe very strongly that a policy of…
Let me give the gentleman a real, live example, if I could respond, with an independent expenditure that was issue advocacy on the Coalition for our Children's Future. They have a board of directors that was in place, and had an executive…
The issue is clear, do we believe as a Congress that the voters of the United States have the right to know who is trying to influence the outcome of an election? Unless we close the issue advocacy loophole, we are not giving the voters…





