Certainly, one source of terrorism is Iran. We are entering into this deal in which we are supposed to waive the sanctions that were enacted to deal with their nuclear program.

I think field hearings are an important part of what our committee does.

America has an interest in the economic and political development of Southeast Asian countries.

Democracy in the Philippines doesn't mean anything unless people can vote for a government that is willing to control what happens on the ground.

Ms. Bautista, the problems for land grabbing in the Philippines, are they widespread throughout the country or focused only in some of the provinces?

If you vote for a government that meets in a building and discusses laws that will be ignored, you might as well vote in a beauty contest.

Critical to that economic development is the rule of law.

The more women are given a chance to expand their horizons, the richer, the more advanced the society becomes.

The enemies of ISIS are more dangerous and more evil than ISIS.

We still have too-big-to-fail. The reason for that is the regulators under Dodd-Frank were given the authority but were not required to break up those that are too-big-to-fail.

Bernie Sanders is, I believe, the only person on that bill in the Senate.

This is not a binding deal. This is not a treaty. This is not binding on Iran.