I don't blame those who are pessimistic. I would doubt the sanity of anyone who bubbled with optimism about a two-state solution.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding these hearings about Burma, or Myanmar. I want to focus on three things: The Rohingya, elections, and U.S. policy.

We say we strongly support the right of the people of Ukraine to freely elect their government.

I disagree with a portion of what Dana Rohrabacher had to say for reasons everybody else has already expressed.

We would have more credibility talking to the world about anti-Semitism if it wasn't so prevalent on at least a few American campuses.

I do not have a dog in this fight. I do not have an orange in this fight.

If we simply abolish the Food for Peace program... we are going to have less total expenditures on aid in the future.

The easiest thing, of course, is just tariffs on their imported goods.

I think it would have less political impact in Russia, although that regime has to be a little shaky.

It is much easier for bureaucracies to say we want money for defense.

If the U.S. Government determined that they wanted as a matter of policy to conduct economic espionage, they could do it.

We have the capacity through cyber and other means to identify which princeling owns which chateaus.