The one thing everybody that has come to this room seems to agree on is that sanctions can change Iran's behavior.

This new deal with Iran is more intrusive than prior deals.

I have been at this for a long time, and we know that Presidents, though, don't always enforce statutes against Iran.

This is not a binding deal. This is not a treaty. This is not binding on Iran.

I assure you that if I could have picked the person to grade my tests in law school, I would have done better.

The best approach to end 'too-big-to-fail' is to end 'too-big-to-fail.'

The good is we get rid of--the good is we get the stockpiles, decommission the centrifuges. The bad is they get their $100 billion.

If you take a huge risk by buying a 30-year bond when you are borrowing your money for 30 days, the regulators come in and kiss you on both cheeks.

the President may not have boxed in Iran and blocked every avenue they have to a nuclear weapon, but he has boxed in Congress

The ugly is next decade when they could have such an enormous nuclear program that in the words of the President, their breakout time would be basically zero.

I would like to know how much money they have on deposit, and then what are the obligations that the host bank or the host country is going to extract from that.

One of the reasons not to vote to disapprove is because we will probably fail to override.