But we urge a no vote on the previous question. If the previous question is defeated, I shall offer an amendment to the rule which would make in order a new section in the rule. The provision would direct the Committee on Rules, as the Speaker knows, to report a resolution immediately that would provide for consideration of a bill to incrementally increase the minimum wage from its current $4.25 an hour to $5.15 an hour beginning on July 4, 1997. That would provide for a separate vote on the minimum wage. Let me make it clear to my colleagues both Democrats and Republicans that defeating the previous question will in fact allow the House to vote on the minimum wage increase. That is what 80 percent of the Americans want us to do. So let us do it.
Anthony Beilenson: “But we urge a no vote on the previous question. If the previous question is defeated, I shall offer an amendment to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to increase the minimum wage during House floor debate.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
Not at all, and I appreciate, as I said earlier, the gentleman's remarks that were most helpful. I want to respond to one more just so the Members will not be too terribly concerned about this either. The gentleman alluded to the fact the…
I think it is different from the understanding we had last night and the arrangement you folks on that side of the aisle worked out. In other words, if the authorizing bill provides for any amount less than the $99 million, even if it is…
Continuing my inquiry, if I may, the report on a block grant bill from the Committee on the Judiciary, House Report 104-24, does not discuss whether the block grant bill will have an inflationary impact on the Nation's economy. There is a…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2202, the Immigration in the National Interest Act, which this modified closed rule makes in order, is one of the most important pieces of legislation we shall consider this year. There is no question that U.S…





