Mr. Speaker, we are particularly troubled by the provision in the bill limiting the President's ability to negotiate issues related to the ABM Treaty that are so important to the national security of the United States. We believe that that is an entirely inappropriate matter to include in the bill. It may even be unconstitutional. Mr. Speaker, the bill does contain a number of other provisions that are similarly of great concern to us. We oppose the decision to slash the legal services program even further. We should be ensuring equal access to the court system to all Americans. What we are doing here is ensuring that low-income Americans are unable to enjoy the benefits of full and equal access to our legal system.
Anthony Beilenson: “Mr. Speaker, we are particularly troubled by the provision in the bill limiting the President's ability to negotiate…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about provisions in the appropriations bill for fiscal year 1997.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
If I may reclaim my time, the gentleman makes a valid point except to say, in fairness, I think the members of the Committee on Rules were not aware of the gentleman's problem or, in fact, that the proper gentlemen were not spoken to with…
Not at all, and I appreciate, as I said earlier, the gentleman's remarks that were most helpful. I want to respond to one more just so the Members will not be too terribly concerned about this either. The gentleman alluded to the fact the…
Continuing my inquiry, if I may, the report on a block grant bill from the Committee on the Judiciary, House Report 104-24, does not discuss whether the block grant bill will have an inflationary impact on the Nation's economy. There is a…
But we urge a no vote on the previous question. If the previous question is defeated, I shall offer an amendment to the rule which would make in order a new section in the rule. The provision would direct the Committee on Rules, as the…





