Political Quotes

On the recordMay 10, 1994
Not at all, and I appreciate, as I said earlier, the gentleman's remarks that were most helpful. I want to respond to one more just so the Members will not be too terribly concerned about this either. The gentleman alluded to the fact the Kanjorski amendment or Kanjorski bill, as originally introduced, had something like a potential $12 billion cost. This gentleman is informed and does, in fact, believe that the amendment which was made in order and for which germaneness was waived does not involve any substantial cost whatsoever and it was on that basis, of course, that we granted this waiver which we thought under the circumstances was, therefore, relatively a technical one.
Said by
Anthony Beilenson
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the Kanjorski amendment and its cost implications during a House floor debate.

Share

More from Anthony Beilenson

Sep 28, 1995

We support this open rule for H.R. 1170, the bill mandating that three-judge panels review constitutional challenges of State referenda. With respect to the bill itself, we are somewhat mystified at the manner in which it has moved through…

govinfo.gov
Sep 28, 1995

Mr. Speaker, we oppose this rule, and we oppose the measure that it makes in order, the conference report on Interior appropriations for fiscal year 1996. The rule waives all points of order against the conference report and against its…

govinfo.gov
Apr 17, 1996

Mr. Speaker, although many of us believe that the so-called Truth in Budgeting Act that would be made in order by this rule is an irresponsible piece of legislation, we have no objections to the rule itself. It is the first open rule the…

govinfo.gov
May 21, 1996

Mr. Speaker, we support this modified open rule for H.R. 3259, the Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 1997. Our only concern about the rule, and it's only a modest concern, is the preprinting requirement, which we are not…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation