The principal point here is that if the $99 million is provided for in the bill, in the authorizing bill passed by this House, then that money, whatever eventual amount of money is decided upon can in fact be appropriated so long as it is within those parameters?
Anthony Beilenson: “The principal point here is that if the $99 million is provided for in the bill, in the authorizing bill passed by this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding provisions in a bill during House debate.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
Mr. Speaker, the dolphin protection bill has created a great deal of controversy within the environmental community which was, after all, responsible for calling our attention to the serious problem of the slaughter of dolphins by the tuna…
Continuing my inquiry, if I may, the report on a block grant bill from the Committee on the Judiciary, House Report 104-24, does not discuss whether the block grant bill will have an inflationary impact on the Nation's economy. There is a…
Mr. Speaker, we support this modified open rule for H.R. 3259, the Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 1997. Our only concern about the rule, and it's only a modest concern, is the preprinting requirement, which we are not…
If I may reclaim my time, the gentleman makes a valid point except to say, in fairness, I think the members of the Committee on Rules were not aware of the gentleman's problem or, in fact, that the proper gentlemen were not spoken to with…





