Listen, Trump has tapped into one thing. It is probably likely that if you want a diminished or at least an accelerated end to the Syrian problem, you are going to have to sit down with the Russians.

Yes. And if I could, just to go beyond that.

One of the things I have always promised in the discussion that led as part of the legislation was, once we get into this new structure, what I promise will be honest and direct feedback on how this is working.

He has got to start talking about a coherent national security plan. It is a number-one issue in Iowa amongst caucus goers.

The President requested approximately $155 million for Israeli Missile Defense in the FY16 budget request, but Israeli's actual needs were approximately $475.2 million.

We've heard much from the administration about missile defense integration and interoperability as a solution to our own missile defense shortfalls.

I will cast my vote against the JCPOA, but I do not believe that the President will heed any call from this Congress about this legacy deal for him.

What is the likely impact on Iran's ballistic missile program of its ability to test freely its ballistic missile capability?

I have stated before that I believe the administration concealed material information concerning Russia's violation of the INF Treaty from the United States Congress.

Is there any legitimate reason for Iran to produce highly enriched uranium, which is to say, HEU enriched to above 4%?

Does DOD support the Israeli requests for U.S. support for coproduction of Arrow III and David's Sling?

As the senior DOD witness, are you able to pledge without hesitation that the administration will make no changes whatsoever in the deployment of an Aegis Ashore site in Romania and Poland as a consequence of the JCPOA?

The problem we are running into, and I think when you move around airports you will see this, is that frequent travelers who are the people we want into this program, have gotten in to it.

You have got a big challenge on your hands. I have been on this committee since it was established...

I hope that you will instill that understanding in them, that if they don't change, they are gone...

If they don't change what they are doing--now, it can't be slight changes, it is gonna be dramatic changes...

That is unacceptable, and that is people who are unwilling to do anything different and don't believe there are consequences...

Public-private partnerships are going to be a creative avenue where we accomplish a lot of the goals.

On rollcall No. 426 I missed the vote, but would have voted ``yea'' had I made it to the floor before was closed. Stated against:

I think it is the responsibility of the Department of Defense and the government to make sure that industrial base is there for national security.

Considering SpaceX's recent failure with a Falcon 9, are you planning to revisit the certification decision? Why or why not?

And I would respond to the ranking member's question with last year's NDAA specific language on this.

I appreciate all of you all.

But I am going to submit them to you all to get back to us for the record because it is noon, and we have worn out our welcome with you all, I am afraid.

We want an engine to be able to get our critical missions into space in a timely fashion.