Why does the United States need the long-range standoff weapon (LRSO)--the follow-on to the current air-launched cruise missile (ALCM)?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the necessity of the LRSO for U.S. defense.
Share
More from Mike Rogers
I agree with Chairman Hill that our committees have a lot of ground to cover on authorities to strengthen the defense industrial base. Mr. Messmer's amendment is a good attempt to break through some of the bureaucracy that has hampered…
I thank the chairman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of this resolution, and I commend the Chair, the leader, and Chairman Arrington on their tremendous work. We have heard about all the ways the House budget…
supports modernization and fundamentally reforms defense acquisition by cutting red tape, eliminating bureaucratic hurdles, and encouraging innovation.
They're going to spend a lot of money trying to make you not like me. We're going to spend our money trying to tell people what we're going to do for them and make their lives in our state better.





