I am not in favor of the wholesale elimination of or drastic reductions to programs simply to hit a budget number.
Lisa Murkowski
The Public Record
Lisa Ann Murkowski is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from Alaska, a position she has held since 2002. A member of the Republican Party, Murkowski has been a prominent figure in Alaskan and national politics, known for her moderate stance on various issues. She was first appointed to the Senate in 2002 and has since been elected multiple times, demonstrating a strong commitment to her constituents and the state of Alaska.
The budget that we are looking at now, in my view, does not use gimmicks, but it does propose some real cuts to the programs.
We have challenges. We are a place that is born and bred to meet challenges with great ingenuity and some enthusiasm.
I thank you for the steps that you are taking to help restore Alaska's trust in the Department.
I would note, however, that PILT should be mandatory and it should not be subject to an across-the-board cut.
This is something that most Alaskans, more than 70 percent, strongly support.
I think it is a good sign that the agency's top priority in this request is to invest in national forest management.
I was pleased to see the Administration note that it is prepared to work with Congress to find a fiscally responsible solution.
I think continued effort, conversation, dialogue and a willingness to get there is important.
I remain dedicated and willing to work with him, with other members of the Committee and members of the Senate.
I think we want to continue to try to do right by these budgets. You mentioned it is tough but we have an obligation here.
I am concerned, and I am speaking for a lot of people in my State who are worried about the inconsistency between the State marijuana laws and the Federal policy.
I think that we have some things that we would like to discuss with you and your folks with regard to fiscal year 2017 funding levels that are a bit problematic.
So many of our communities have none whatsoever. As a consequence, we are dealing with some very troubling statistics within our State.
It just seems that we have kind of a self-reinforcing spiral when it comes to certain drug costs.
Well, why can we not just get our pharmaceuticals through the mail and through licensed providers in Canada?





