Dan Sullivan

Thank you, but do you think we can take action like that in terms of a law that mandates that? Because again, right now, they lose but they win.

They are clearly trying to rewrite the Clean Water Act, they are clearly trying to expand their jurisdiction.

I actually think that agency acts inconsistently with the law on a very regular basis.

I think there are 30 States that are now suing them. I think they are going to win.

It is Democrats and Republicans, by the way, in this Congress who believe they are violating the law with regards to the waters of the U.S.

The Supreme Court in the last two terms that it had, the Michigan case just came down and then the Utility Air Regulators case.

After the agreement's signed, they're doing the 'Death to the--Death to America' chanting.

It seems to me the snap-back provision is more aimed at us, it's more a boomerang provision, than it is at them.

It's pretty obvious to me they--we say we want a new relationship. In the text, they're silent.

The snapback is actually more focused on the United States than it is Iran.

I think it would be helpful if you didn't use that term much. It is not in the agreement. I think, in some ways, it is deceitful because it is an illusion.

Iran has stated that it will treat such reintroduction, reimposition of the sanctions in Annex 2 as grounds to cease performing its commitments.

I think that just the term 'homeless veteran' is something that kind of chokes up a lot of us.

The solution is a home.

I am wondering, kind of following on a little bit of Senator Blumenthal's question, to what degree have you seen that our women veterans homelessness is a result of domestic violence.

You know, for a big State like Alaska, we have a lot of veterans who live in very remote rural areas.

We want to make sure that no matter where a veteran lives, that we have the opportunity to have vouchers that are going to meet those needs.

You will take a look at this definition and make sure that women who fall into that category can avail themselves of the services?

If there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it stand adjourned under the previous order. There being no objection, the Senate, at 8:07 p.m., adjourned until Friday, July 24, 2015, at 9 a.m…

I think it was another example of classic EPA overreach claiming powers that they do not have.

The President vetoed the Keystone XL pipeline despite 65 Senators being for that project.

I told the EPA we did not recognize their authority because they did not have jurisdiction over the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System.

Legally, I think that the EPA is a rogue agency.

We should all be outraged, Democrats, Republicans, that an agency regularly violates the law.

My State probably has the cleanest air, cleanest water, certainly in the United States, maybe in the world.