On the recordJuly 28, 2015
It seems to me the snap-back provision is more aimed at us, it's more a boomerang provision, than it is at them.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Sullivan critiques the snap-back provision, suggesting it primarily affects the U.S.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
Apr 4, 2025
I call up my amendment No. 2035 and ask that it be reported by number. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Alaska [Mr. Sullivan] proposes an amendment numbered 2035 to…
Nov 7, 2025
Imagine that--we want to pay our military during a shutdown, including the Coast Guard. Senator Johnson came to me and said: Dan, I have a broader bill. Let's pay everybody who is required to work to keep us safe in America. I said: Great…
Jul 17, 2025
what I really want to do is do something that I think is probably the best highlight of Thursday speeches in the Senate--I think the pages all certainly agree; they are all nodding-- for the people watching across America. It is the…
Apr 10, 2025
I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Budd). Without objection, it is so ordered. The Senator from Alaska.
Other voices in this conversation
