How would making these programs mandatory or formula-based impact planning for large-scale projects?

it point blank undermines existing habitat conservation efforts.

It is especially troubling to learn how these clawbacks impact tribes, since it is my understanding how many feel that they have been left out of this process.

This legislation is a combination of policies that would, if enacted, increase the chances of recovering at-risk species.

the main point of the blue ribbon panel was this guaranteed annual funding, and the level of guaranteed annual funding needed to do the job.

I cannot support the America's Wildlife Habitat Conservation Act because, simply put, it doesn't meet the recommendations laid out by the blue ribbon panel.

I am proud to co-sponsor this important legislation to promote habitat conservation from the ground up.

The IRS has had their work cut out for them, with a very long list of major implementation issues over the last decade.

While I am grateful for your partnership in these efforts, it won't surprise you that I also have a number of concerns about the Biden Administration's approach to the IRS.

I commend the IRS where credit--for the ERTC claims, for processing them.

Congress cannot step in to provide assistance every once in a while.

I do hope that we can move further on this issue.

Now, the farm bill is the best opportunity that exists to course-correct.

This bill permanently expands SNAP eligibility to college students.

we can support our farmers and hungry families at the same time. This is not an either/or situation.

I appreciate the willingness to work together. I feel like removing section 5 would undermine our efforts to find adequate funding, but--so I would prefer to leave it in.

But the fact is that, to do that, there are good ways to do that and there are ways that really aren't helping the American farmer.

To be clear, the Republican proposal does not cut, decrease, or impact SNAP benefits.