White House Chiefs of Staff

It will mean heretofore that when a president is impeached that one party can deny the other witnesses, and that will be the new normal that would be trials without witnesses.

If we're going to sacrifice the national security of the country if we're going to withhold military aid. If we're going to bestow favors in U.S. resources to countries where the President has investments, is that what we want driving U.S…

We do that all the time with foreign policy.

So that was -- those were the driving factors that he also mentioned to me in past that the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely, no question about that. But that's it, that's why we held up the money.

We do that all the time with foreign policy. I have news for you. Get over it.

Again, I was involved with the process by which the money was held up temporarily.

There's going to be political influence in foreign policy.

The look back to what happened in 2016 certainly was - was part of the thing that he was worried about in corruption with that nation, and that is absolutely appropriate.

This is a corrupt place, I don't want to send them a bunch of money have them waist it, have them spend it, have them use it to line their own pockets.

We're going to do the 46th G7 Summit on June 10th through 12th at the Trump National Doral Facility in Miami. Doral was by far and away, far and away the best physical facility for this meeting.

I think the President has pretty much made it very clear since he's got here that he doesn't profit from being here, he has no interest in profit from being here.

We're going to do the 46th G7 Summit on June 10 through June 12 at the Trump National Doral Facility in Miami. Doral was by far and away, far and away the best physical facility for this meeting.

We do -- we do that all the time with foreign policy.

The look back to what happened in 2016 certainly was part of the thing that he was worried about in corruption with that nation. That is absolutely appropriate.

I have news for everybody. Get over. There is going to be political influence in foreign policy.

Now, it is nearly impossible to fire a Federal worker. I know that because a lot of them work for me. But by simply saying to people we are going to take you outside the bubble, outside this liberal haven of Washington, DC, they quit. What…

the recent push to relocate federal workers from the Washington, D.C. area is all about 'draining the swamp.'

We do not set a specific percentage of specific number.

I asked him, well, so should we compete with the Communist Government of China selling things below cost?

We shouldn't pass the DoD appropriations bill--because they get paid--until we have negotiated and passed.

He didn't explain a decision. He went out there justifying reckless behavior by the President. He wasn't serving as attorney general, he's serving the President's guidance counselor.

He was putting his fist on the scale for the American public. It was a lot more than a thumb.

a benefit of moving federal agencies out of Washington, DC is that it causes federal employees to quit their jobs.

What we've done is not to try and remove the safety net for folks who need it, but to try and figure out if there's folks who don't need it that need to be back in the workforce.