According to a February 2006 report by the GAO, Pennsylvania would lose $9 million and California would lose $18.5 million in 1 year. With this bill that allows those States to still count the people that matter while the systems are transitioning, Pennsylvania would instead gain $4.8 million and California would gain $15.4 million.
Mike Enzi: “According to a February 2006 report by the GAO, Pennsylvania would lose $9 million and California would lose $18.5…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial impacts of a bill on Pennsylvania and California during a floor speech.
Share
More from Mike Enzi
I just want to thank all the people who came and listened, and I hope there were other Senators who were watching on their televisions and taking notes on the 80-percent tool and other things that I mentioned. But I just appreciate the…
I suspect I couldn't have come to the floor at a better time. The President's budget did come out today. It consists of a set of documents a foot high. In my opinion, the whole pile should be replaced with a list from the President of what…
the Bipartisan Budget Act of 20l9, P.L. 116- 37, included an instruction to the chairman of the Senate Committee on the Budget to file allocations, aggregates, and budgetary levels in the Senate between April 15, 2020, and May 15, 2020…
I rise today to acknowledge the retirement of my friend, Dr. Jim Naramore. Dr. Naramore is retiring after 40 years of service practicing family medicine in Gillette, WY. He has been an outstanding doctor to many patients in Gillette…





