I would. But there is no reason it has to be. They hunt in the Grand Teton National Park. It does not stop anything from going on there. Hunting can be eliminated under that status, as well. It is not an issue between hunting and mining. Our issues of protection are not all that different.
Malcolm Wallop: “I would. But there is no reason it has to be. They hunt in the Grand Teton National Park. It does not stop anything from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing hunting and mining regulations in Grand Teton National Park.
Share
More from Malcolm Wallop
The situation has changed, the national parks are enormously popular--and indeed they are. One of the reasons they are enormously popular is because of the visitor facilities that have been provided under the Concessions Act. The type of…
I rise in opposition to the nomination of Derek Shearer to be Ambassador to Finland. While Finland may not figure in the world's hot spots right now, it may unfortunately again become more central to United States policymaking--given…
I thank the Senator from Kentucky. Mr. President, I speak today as a former chairman, and former vice chairman, of the Ethics Committee which sat in judgment on one of the most difficult and contentious ethics cases that this Senate has…
Is the Senator aware that my amendment adopts all her findings and, therefore, the mining issue, to the extent it exists, exists in yours as well as mine? We do not permit mining, just valid existing rights, which yours does. So mining is…





