The Senator from Wyoming wanted to reach the inescapable conclusion that, by refusing to come to grips with this, we are, in fact, indulging in an organized coverup of something. Whether or not that is true, the public impression of it has to be growing that there is an unwillingness on the part of the majority party to come to grips in ways in which they have come to grips as the leader points out with Republicans. So the only inescapable conclusion is that there must be something to hide; otherwise, the hearings would do a lot to alleviate the President's Presidency from this overhanging cloud. Is that a fair assumption?
Malcolm Wallop: “The Senator from Wyoming wanted to reach the inescapable conclusion that, by refusing to come to grips with this, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing perceptions of a coverup related to the President during Senate debate.
Share
More from Malcolm Wallop
I would. But there is no reason it has to be. They hunt in the Grand Teton National Park. It does not stop anything from going on there. Hunting can be eliminated under that status, as well. It is not an issue between hunting and mining…
I will say to my friend from Kentucky that I have not seen the bill, but I am inclined to be on it with him. I see all over the place signs that we are going to start charging for unimproved access to various recreation forests, national…
I hope that somehow or another we can find a way to come to our senses, because it is not a responsible thing to do to acquire more and more land without the means of caring for it. I know ranchers who do that, and the condition of those…
I have spoken my piece. I have the belief, as I have stated, that the legislation is ill-founded and unwise. It has passed the committee. It will most certainly probably pass the Senate. But my opinion on it is now recorded.





