Decisions about the future of public lands should involve, I believe, the best science, meaningful and ongoing coordination with local stakeholders, with state and local government...
This change would result in plans that do not reflect the on the ground realities and ultimately, will disenfranchise knowledgeable, local a...
As written, Planning 2.0 will effectively ignore expert knowledge in both local agency offices and among local land users.
Unfortunately, the proposed changes will, in my mind, decrease stakeholder involvement at crucial points in the planning process.
Yes, some may view this as a double standard in that the rules that apply to everybody else do not apply to the BLM.
I am concerned that instead of actually increasing public involvement and streamlining the planning process, this Planning 2.0 process will ...
I think Planning 2.0 fails in all these categories.
I think some folks may question that in terms of whether it is procedural or if it actually impacts on the ground.
I’d like your commitment to reforming the culture in IHS to insisting that agency leaders treat their constituency with the dignity and the ...
We believe that structure reform of the agency is needed.
The legislation proposed by Chairman Barrasso and Senator Thune, the Indian Health Service Accountability Act of 2016, is attempting to addr...