So, you mentioned the MCLs, but you also mentioned CERCLA. The role of CERCLA in this is that water systems could bear the liability costs, correct, if EPA moves forward with designating certain PFAS compounds as hazardous substances?
Lummis questions the financial implications of designating PFAS as hazardous under CERCLA.
Share
More from Cynthia M. Lummis
So if your ultimate goal is to provide real consumer protection, shouldn't the SEC withdraw Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 to allow banks to provide custody?
The Congress, both under the last Administration and under this one, has embarked on an irresponsible spending spree.
The problems that you are solving with your approaches are extremely important.
Other voices in this conversation
