Yes, it is my understanding that use of this phrase in section 4 of the bill is intended to incorporate the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of this term, including, but not limited to, the case Rendell-Baker v. Kohn and NCAA v. Tarkanian cases. I would like to now turn to section 6 of the bill, which provides that no church or religious nonprofit will be forced to solemnize or conduct a marriage ceremony under this bill. Is it your understanding that section 6(b) bars ``any civil claim or cause of action,'' without exception, relating to a church or religious organization's refusal to solemnize or celebrate a marriage under this section, and the text does not state that it can be overruled by a court in finding a ``compelling governmental interest''?
Cynthia Lummis: “Yes, it is my understanding that use of this phrase in section 4 of the bill is intended to incorporate the U.S. Supreme…”
On the recordNovember 29, 2022
Share
More from Cynthia Lummis
Sep 1, 2026
So Senator Barasso and I are riding along the parade route, the same parade route Wyoming has watched for generations. And as we came down the street, I could hear it from my constituents, over and over: 'Pass the SAVE Act, Senator. Pass…
Oct 2, 2026
Senator Kelly and I agree on something simple: we can keep the NRC’s high safety standards and still stop making enrichment companies wait years just to break ground.
Sep 11, 2026
“Nearly a decade ago, Wyoming wrote the blueprint for digital asset regulation, and this bill finally brings that clarity to the rest of the country,”
Sep 11, 2026
“Unlike rulemaking, legislation gives this industry a lasting solution that shields it from the whiplash of changes in the White House.





