I would like to commend the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee on its committee report which provides funding to complete the final development of the Vessel Traffic System [VTS] 2000. This is a system that is necessary to enhance the safety and environmental quality of our country's vital ports and waterways. In the recent past, and quoted in the committee's report, the GAO has estimated the cost of establishing these VTS Systems at the originally envisioned 17 ports at a cost of up to $310 million. Through a competitive bidding process and the widespread use of commercial off-the-shelf and non-developmental equipment, the estimated costs have now been dramatically reduced. In fact, recent estimates of the costs are well below those estimated by the GAO--now less than $200 million. And that number could be substantially reduced depending on what type of systems are implemented as part of VTS 2000.
David Cay Johnston: “I would like to commend the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee on its committee report which provides funding to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for the Vessel Traffic System 2000 during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Well, as of this moment, Donald Trump is out of business in New York because all of his business certificates, business licenses in effect have been cancelled.
Thus, we hold that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act creates an obligation in DOE to start disposing of the spent nuclear fuel no later than January 31, 1998. Is there any disagreement with what I read in the decision?
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
the Government cannot violate contractual rights. The second question is what is the duty of the Federal Government with respect to nuclear waste? It so happens that the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has decided that very…





