the Government cannot violate contractual rights. The second question is what is the duty of the Federal Government with respect to nuclear waste? It so happens that the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has decided that very question definitively and clearly on July 23, 1996. Here is what they have said... Thus we hold that section 302(a)(5)(B) creates an obligation in DOE, reciprocal to the utilities' obligation to pay, to start disposing of spent nuclear fuel no later than January 31, 1998. Let me repeat that: . . . we hold that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act creates an obligation in DOE . . . to start disposing of the spent nuclear fuel no later than January 31, 1998. What the decision does is delineates between the duty of the Federal Government to accept title, which the court clearly says is dependent upon the completion of a nuclear repository, and the duty to dispose of the spent nuclear fuel on January 31, 1998, which is an absolute duty. So, come January 31, 1998, the Federal Government must dispose of this nuclear waste, whether or not the facility is complete.
David Cay Johnston: “the Government cannot violate contractual rights. The second question is what is the duty of the Federal Government with…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Federal Government's obligation regarding nuclear waste disposal.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
As my good friend from New Mexico, the chairman of the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee and many other Members are aware, the subcommittee continues to support a strong Fusion Energy Sciences Program. As noted in the report…
The Senator is aware that Vietnam is anxious to have aid from the American Bar Association in helping them develop the rule of law. We have not had that kind of request from Libya and Cuba and others. They are anxious to develop the rule…
No, the Senator is wrong. First of all, damages would not be paid from the nuclear waste fund. Damages would have to be paid from the judgment fund, provided elsewhere.
today I am introducing the DOE Reports Elimination and Streamlining Act of 1996, to implement a number of recommendations that have been received from the administration for the repeal of requirements for unnecessary or obsolete reports to…





