The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31, 1998. Is the Senator saying that their duty to dispose of the waste does not involve any responsibility, any duty to pay damages?
David Cay Johnston: “The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that…”
On the recordJuly 31, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the responsibilities related to nuclear waste disposal during a Senate debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 25, 1996
The Senator is aware that Vietnam is anxious to have aid from the American Bar Association in helping them develop the rule of law. We have not had that kind of request from Libya and Cuba and others. They are anxious to develop the rule…
Jul 31, 1996
nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.





