The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31, 1998. Is the Senator saying that their duty to dispose of the waste does not involve any responsibility, any duty to pay damages?
Discussing the responsibilities related to nuclear waste disposal during a Senate debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
Other voices in this conversation
