I rise in support of the Metcalf-Tiahrt-Luther amendment which will freeze the cost-of-living adjustment [COLA] for members of this body, judicial branch, and senior executive branch officials. When we, as Members of Congress, make more than three-fourths of this country's workforce, there is absolutely no reason to give ourselves a raise. We took the first steps towards a fiscally sound Nation last fall by passing a budget that would bring us into balance in 7 years. I believe we can and should show the American people that we mean business by voting to hold our own salaries at 1993 levels. As we ask all other Federal departments to tighten their belts, we should do our part by not accepting this COLA. I just cannot see, nor can I justify, giving myself a raise in the midst of a $5 trillion national debt. Voting to freeze our pay at 1993 levels will have a direct effect on the debt because it will lower our pension burden on the American taxpayer. Members of this body, Mr. Chairman, voted in 1989 to give themselves this COLA. Had I been a Member of Congress at that time I would not have supported a pay raise then and I will not support a pay raise now. I urge my colleagues to support the amendment.
Scott Klug: “I rise in support of the Metcalf-Tiahrt-Luther amendment which will freeze the cost-of-living adjustment [COLA] for…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment to freeze cost-of-living adjustments for Congress and federal officials.
Share
More from Scott Klug
Let me make the point, we have had hearings on this. The question is, Where do the hearings have to happen? Do they have to happen here in Washington or in Wisconsin? Thirty hearings, town hall meetings, as my colleague, Mr. Sensenbrenner…
We have a very important fundamental choice before us today. To what degree do we trust the citizens of Wisconsin to make their own decision about welfare reform and to what degree do we think that Wisconsin's plan needs to be modified…
Mr. Chairman, the Appalachian Regional Commission was first established in 1965 to help promote the economic development of the Appalachian region. Since then the Federal Government has poured more than $7 billion into funding for…
If there is no subsidy involved in this program, why are they fighting so hard to preserve it? And if there is no implication whatsoever if we eliminate it, then they should not be fighting to eliminate it. That is the bottom line in this…





