Political Quotes

Scott Klug: Mr. Chairman, the Appalachian Regional Commission was first established in 1965 to help promote the economic development…

On the recordJuly 24, 1997
Mr. Chairman, the Appalachian Regional Commission was first established in 1965 to help promote the economic development of the Appalachian region. Since then the Federal Government has poured more than $7 billion into funding for projects. Some of these projects to essentially boost economic development include $750,000 from Federal taxpayers to help pay for the Carolina Panthers NFL stadium or $1.2 million for the National Track and Field Hall of Fame. The Appalachian Regional Commission was first established back in 1965 and 3 years later, the Nixon administration began one of the first attempts to kill the Appalachian Regional Commission. Here I am 32 years after the Appalachian Regional Commission was first begun to essentially carry on this sometimes valiant and quixotic fight. What we are here to consider tonight, Mr. Chairman, is an amendment specifically aimed at the Appalachian Regional Commission's road program. Some of these projects, back to a catalog of ARC's long and sordid history, include $2.9 million under the guise of economic development for an access road to a Pennsylvania ski resort.
Said by
Scott Klug
Republican · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the history and funding of the Appalachian Regional Commission during a committee meeting.

Share

More from Scott Klug

Jun 23, 1997

let us try to put this all in perspective for a minute, if we can, because I think if we are listening to the debate in this Chamber, it is a little hard exactly to figure out what is at issue. Opponents of this amendment, I think, have…

govinfo.gov
Sep 10, 1996

What we are talking about, for folks at home who may be confused about this debate, is an insurance program run by the Federal Government for corporations who want to invest in risky political situations. They want to invest in risky…

govinfo.gov
Jun 6, 1996

Unfortunately in this case, my colleague from Wisconsin, Mr. Barrett, is wrong. Actually, in one fairly significant fight with the Clinton administration, Wisconsin originally asked, under the work not welfare waiver request, that every…

govinfo.gov
Jul 10, 1997

If there is no subsidy involved in this program, why are they fighting so hard to preserve it? And if there is no implication whatsoever if we eliminate it, then they should not be fighting to eliminate it. That is the bottom line in this…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation